[20010227]RS20828_阿拉巴马大学诉加勒特：联邦制对《美国残疾人法案》的限制.pdf

1 505 U.S. 144 (1992).2 Curt A. Levey, “The Quiet Revolution Conservatives Continue Federalism Resurgence byExpanding State Immunity,” 157 N.J.L.J. 707 (August 23, 1999). See also Thomas, “Federalismand the Constitution: Limits on Congressional Power,” CRS Rep. No. 30315.3 Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999)(Congress lacks the authority when exercising Article Ipowers to subject non-consenting states to private suits for damages in state courts); CollegeSavings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Educ. Expense Bd., 527 U. S.666 (1999) (TheTrademark Remedy Clarification Act, TRCA, which subjected states to suit for false andmisleading advertising, did not validly abrogate state sovereign immunity; neither the right to befree from a business competitors false advertising nor a more generalized right to be secure in(continued.)Congressional Research Service ? The Library of CongressCRS Report for CongressReceived through the CRS WebOrder Code RS20828February 27, 2001University of Alabama v. Garrett: FederalismLimits on the Americans with Disabilities Act name redactedLegislative AttorneyAmerican Law DivisionSummaryOn Feb. 21, 2001, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, held that the