书签 分享 收藏 举报 版权申诉 / 4
1

类型[20200602]LSB10485_这不是通用的吗:最高法院将考虑使用通用术语的网址是否可以注册商标.pdf

  • 上传人:任**
  • 文档编号:29384
  • 上传时间:2022-06-24
  • 发布时间:2020-06-03
  • 格式:PDF
  • 页数:4
  • 大小:636KB
  • CRS Legal Sidebar Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Legal SidebarLegal Sidebari i Isnt It Generic: Supreme Court to Consider Whether Web Addresses Using Generic Terms May Be Trademarked June 2, 2020 What can be trademarked? On May 4, 2020, in its first telephonic oral argument ever, the Supreme Court heard arguments addressing this question. Generally, trademarks protect the goodwill that a company has built in a “distinctive” name or mark. Whether a mark is distinctive can depend on a number of factors, but, under long-standing trademark principles, a “generic” mark is never distinctive and therefore may not be protected under trademark law. A mark is generic if it is the “common name of a product” or “the genus of which the particular product is a species.” For example, one could not trademark the name “LITE BEER for light beer, or CONVENIENT STORE for convenience stores.” B, a hotel reservation company, applied to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) for a trademark on its business name, BOOKING.COM. The PTO denied the application, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Fourth Circuit) held that BOOKING.COM is a protectable mark. In PTO v. B, the
    展开阅读全文
    特殊限制:

    部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。

    关 键  词:
    20200602 LSB10485_ 这不 通用 最高法院 考虑 使用 术语 网址 是否 可以 注册商标
    1
    提示  联参智库所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
    关于本文
    本文标题:[20200602]LSB10485_这不是通用的吗:最高法院将考虑使用通用术语的网址是否可以注册商标.pdf
    链接地址:https://www.lianhezuozhan.com/doc/29384.html
    1

    客服:010-66465788   北京联参科技有限公司版权所有  工业和信息化部备案/许可证编号:京ICP备2022007273号-1



    联参智库