[20171114]IN10817_《预算控制法》自由支配支出上限对持续解决方案的影响.pdf
-
资源ID：26817
资源大小：345.98KB
全文页数：4页
- 资源格式： PDF
下载：注册后免费下载
快捷下载
账号登录下载
微信登录下载
|
友情提示
2、PDF文件下载后，可能会被浏览器默认打开，此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单，保存网页到桌面，就可以正常下载了。
3、本站不支持迅雷下载，请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器，或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩，下载后原文更清晰。
5、试题试卷类文档，如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案，请知晓。
|
[20171114]IN10817_《预算控制法》自由支配支出上限对持续解决方案的影响.pdf
1、 CRS INSIGHT Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress INSIGHTINSIGHTi i Impact of the Budget Control Act Discretionary Spending Caps on a Continuing Resolution name redacted Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process name redacted Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process Nov
2、ember 14, 2017 What are the requirements of the BCA for FY2018 appropriations? Appropriations enacted for FY2018 are subject to two statutory discretionary spending limits established by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA): One applies to defense discretionary spending, and the other applies to non
3、defense discretionary spending. The defense spending limit for FY2018 is $549 billion and applies to discretionary spending in budget function 050 (national defense) only. The nondefense spending limit for FY2018 is $516 billion and applies to discretionary spending in all other budget functions. Th
4、e BCA stipulates that some spending is effectively exempt from the limits, such as appropriations designated as emergency requirements or for overseas contingency operations. If appropriations are enacted that exceed either the defense or nondefense discretionary limits, a sequester would be trigger
